ABSTRACT Objective Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), anaerobic threshold, walking economy, and cardiovascular responses during walking are used to guide and monitor walking training in patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication. Women with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication present greater impairments than men, and evaluating training markers according to sex for decisions regarding walking prescription in this population is important. This study aimed to compare VO2peak, walking economy, anaerobic threshold, and cardiovascular responses during walking in men and women with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication. Methods Forty patients (20 men and 20 women with similar baseline characteristics) underwent a cardiopulmonary treadmill test (3.2km/h and 2% increase in slope every 2 minutes until maximal leg pain). The VO2 and rate-pressure product were assessed. Data from men and women were compared using t-tests. Results There were no significant differences between men and women (VO2peak: 15.0±4.8 versus 13.9±2.9mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.38; walking economy: 9.6±2.7 versus 8.4±1.6mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.09; anaerobic threshold: 10.5±3.2 versus 10.5±2.2mL∙kg-1∙min-1, p=0.98; rate pressure product at 1st stage: 13,465± 2,910 versus 14,445±4,379bpm∙mmHg, p=0.41; and rate pressure product at anaerobic threshold:13,673±3,100 versus 16,390±5,870bpm∙mmHg, p=0.08 and rate pressure product at peak exercise: 21,253±6,141 versus 21,923±7,414bpm∙mmHg, p=0.76, respectively). Conclusion Men and women with peripheral artery disease and similar baseline characteristics presented similar responses to walking, suggesting that decisions regarding walking prescription and monitoring can be made regardless of sex in this specific population.

Resumo Fundamento A frequência cardíaca em repouso (FCR) pode ser uma ferramenta útil de triagem para o risco cardiovascular. Porém, os pontos de corte para FCR nunca foram descritos em populações jovens. Objetivo Estabelecer os pontos de corte para FCR em adolescentes brasileiros e analisar se há associação entre pontos de corte e fatores de risco cardiovascular. Métodos A amostra foi composta por 6.794 adolescentes (de 10 a 19 anos). A pressão arterial e a FCR foram avaliadas por dispositivo oscilométrico. Também foram avaliados o índice de massa corporal e a circunferência da cintura. Foi adotada a curva ROC para analisar a sensibilidade e especificidade, e as associações de FCR elevada com os fatores de risco cardiovascular foram analisadas por regressão logística binária. Foi considerado estatisticamente significante um valor de p < 0,05 para todas as análises. Resultados Os valores médios da FCR eram mais altos entre os participantes de 10 a 14 anos do naqueles de 15 a 19 anos, em meninos (p < 0,001) e meninas (< 0,001). Os pontos de corte de FCR propostos para detecção de fatores de risco cardiovascular foram significativos para meninos de 10 a 14 (> 92 bpm) e de 15 a 19 anos (> 82 bpm) e para meninas de 15 a 19 anos (> 82 bpm) (p < 0,05 para todos), enquanto nenhum ponto de corte foi identificado para as meninas de 10 a 14 anos (p > 0,05). Os pontos de corte propostos para a FCR foram associados com obesidade abdominal, sobrepeso e pressão arterial elevada em meninos e meninas. Os pontos de corte da FCR foram associados ao conjunto de fatores de risco cardiovascular em adolescentes de 15 a 19 anos. Conclusões Os pontes de corte propostos para a FCR foram associados com os fatores de risco cardiovascular em adolescentes.

Abstract Background Resting heart rate (RHR) may be a useful screening tool for cardiovascular risk. However, RHR cutoff points, an interesting clinical approach, have never been described in young populations. Objective To establish RHR cutoff points in Brazilian adolescents and to analyze whether cutoff points are associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The sample was composed of 6,794 adolescents (10 to 19 years old). Blood pressure and RHR were assessed by oscillometric device. Body mass index and waist circumference were also assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to analyze the sensitivity and specificity, and associations of high RHR with cardiovascular risk factors were analyzed by binary logistic regression. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analyses. Results Mean RHR values were higher among participants ages 10 to 14 years than 15 to 19 years, for boys (p < 0.001) and girls (< 0.001). The proposed RHR cutoff points for cardiovascular risk factors detection were significant for boys ages 10 to 14 (> 92 bpm) and 15 to 19 years (> 82 bpm), as well as for girls ages 15 to 19 years (> 82 bpm) (p < 0.05 for all), whereas no cutoff point was identified for girls ages 10 to 14 years (p > 0.05). Proposed RHR cutoff points were associated with abdominal obesity, overweight, and high blood pressure in boys in girls. RHR cutoff points were associated with the cluster of cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents ages 15 to 19 years. Conclusion The proposed RHR cutoff points were associated with cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a influência da hipertensão na saúde cardiovascular em pacientes com doença arterial periférica sintomática, e identificar fatores associados à hipertensão arterial não controlada. Métodos: Neste estudo transversal foram incluídos 251 pacientes com doença arterial periférica (63,9% homens e média de idade 67±10 anos). Hipertensão foi diagnosticada e pressão arterial foi avaliada para determinar o controle da hipertensão. Foram avaliadas rigidez arterial (velocidade da onda de pulso carótida-femoral) e modulação autonômica cardíaca (balanço simpatovagal). Resultados: Hipertensão foi associada com maior velocidade da onda de pulso carótida-femoral, independentemente do sexo, idade, índice tornozelo-braço, índice de massa corpórea, capacidade de deambulação, frequência cardíaca, ou comorbidades (ß=2,59±0,76m/s, b=0,318, p=0,003). Pacientes com pressão arterial sistólica ≥120mmHg tiveram maior velocidadeda onda de pulso carótida-femoral do que normotensos, e pacientes hipertensos com pressão arterial sistólica ≤119mmHg (normotensos: 7,6±2,4m/s=≤119mmHg: 8,1±2,2m/s 120-129mmHg: 9,8±2,6m/s=≥130mmHg: 9,9±2,9m/s, p<0,005). Balanço simpatovagal não foi associado à hipertensão. Conclusão: Pacientes hipertensos com doença arterial periférica sintomática apresentam maior rigidez arterial. Em pacientes com pressão arterial não controlada, a rigidez arterial é ainda mais elevada.

ABSTRACT Objective: To examine the impact of hypertension on cardiovascular health in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and to identify factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension. Methods: A cross-sectional study including 251 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (63.9% males, mean age 67±10 years). Following hypertension diagnosis, blood pressure was measured to determine control of hypertension. Arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) and cardiac autonomic modulation (sympathovagal balance) were assessed. Results: Hypertension was associated with higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, regardless of sex, age, ankle-brachial index, body mass index, walking capacity, heart rate, or comorbidities (ß=2.59±0.76m/s, b=0.318, p=0.003). Patients with systolic blood pressure ≥120mmHg had higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity values than normotensive individuals, and hypertensive patients with systolic blood pressure of ≤119mmHg (normotensive: 7.6±2.4m/s=≤119mmHg: 8.1±2.2m/s 120-129mmHg:9.8±2.6m/s=≥130mmHg: 9.9±2.9m/s, p<0.005). Sympathovagal balance was not associated with hypertension (p>0.05). Conclusion: Hypertensive patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease have increased arterial stiffness. Arterial stiffness is even greater in patients with uncontrolled high blood pressure.

Abstract Background Hypertensive patients present, in addition to worse cardiovascular health, lower health-related quality of life compared to normotensive subjects. Factors such as functional capacity, functional status, pain, participation in social activities, mental and emotional health, fatigue and energy level, along with perception of general health, seem to be relevant for evaluation in this population. However, evidence is unclear in hypertensive patients. Objective To analyze the factors associated with quality of life in hypertensive patients. Methods Forty-five patients were recruited. The dependent variables of the present study are the quality of life domains. Demographic data and clinical conditions were considered independent variables. The Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire was used to measure quality of life. Handgrip strength, blood pressure and anthropometric indicators were evaluated. Crude and adjusted linear regression analysis was used. Results It was verified that education level, body mass index and muscle strength were associated with the functional capacity domain (p < 0,05), whereas systolic blood pressure was associated with the physical domain (p < 0,05). Women presented lower quality of life on the pain domain compared to men and educational level was associated with the social domain (p < 0,05). Conclusion Hypertensive patients with lower levels of body mass index, higher levels of education and muscle strength presented a better quality of life on the physical domain, while the social aspects presented a positive relationship with education level. Women presented a worse quality of life on the pain domain compared to men. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; 33(2):133-142)

RESUMO Introdução: Uma única sessão de treinamento de resistência reduz a pressão arterial (PA) braquial em pacientes com doença arterial periférica (DAP). No entanto, não se sabe se respostas semelhantes ocorrem na PA aórtica, que é considerada um melhor preditor de eventos cardiovasculares. Objetivo: Este estudo visou analisar os efeitos de uma sessão de treinamento de resistência sobre a PA aórtica de pacientes com DAP. Métodos: Este estudo randomizado, cruzado e controlado envolveu 16 pacientes. Todos realizaram uma sessão experimental de treinamento de resistência: sessão força (SF - três séries de 10 repetições em oito exercícios, intensidade de cinco a sete na escala de OMNI-Res) e uma sessão controle (SC -repouso por 50 minutos). Antes e depois de cada sessão, a PA aórtica foi avaliada pela técnica de tonometria de aplanação. Resultados: Houve um aumento na PA aórtica sistólica (P < 0,002) e média (P < 0,001) nas duas sessões, entretanto, aumentos maiores foram observados na SC (P < 0,001). Além disso, a PA aórtica diastólica só aumentou após a SC (P = 0,004). O efeito hipotensor do exercício sobre a PA aórtica sistólica, diastólica e média foi de -12 ± 2, -6 ± 2, e -7 ± 2 mmHg, respectivamente. Conclusão: Uma única sessão de treinamento de resistência promoveu efeito hipotensor na PA aórtica de pacientes com DAP, indicando uma redução aguda do risco cardiovascular nessa população. Nível de Evidência Nível I; Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.

ABSTRACT Introduction: A single session of resistance training decreases brachial blood pressure (BP) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, it is not known whether similar responses occur in aortic BP, which is a better predictor of cardiovascular risk. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effects of a single session of resistance training on aortic BP in PAD patients. Methods: This randomized, crossover, controlled trial involved 16 patients. All of them performed a session of resistance training (R - 3 x 10 reps in eight exercises, 5-7 on the OMNI Scale) and a control session (C - resting for 50 min). Before and after each session, aortic BP was assessed by applanation tonometry technique. Results: There was an increase in systolic (P<0.002) and mean (P<0.001) aortic BP in both sessions; however, higher increases were observed in C session (P<0.001). Additionally, diastolic aortic BP only increased after C session (P=0.004). The hypotensive effect of the exercise on systolic, diastolic, and mean aortic BP were -12±2, -6±2, and -7±2 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: A single session of resistance training promoted a hypotensive effect on aortic BP of patients with PAD, indicating an acute reduction in cardiovascular risk in this population. Level of Evidence I; Therapeutic studies - Investigating the results of treatment.

RESUMEN Introducción: Una sola sesión de entrenamiento de resistencia reduce la presión arterial (PA) braquial de pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica (EAP). Sin embargo, no se sabe si respuestas similares ocurren en la PA aórtica, que es considerada un mejor predictor de eventos cardiovasculares. Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar los efectos de una sesión de entrenamiento de resistencia sobre la PA aórtica de pacientes con EAP. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio aleatorizado, cruzado y controlado que involucró a 16 pacientes Todos realizaron una sesión experimental de entrenamiento de resistencia: sesión de fuerza (SF - tres series de 10 repeticiones en ocho ejercicios, intensidad de cinco a siete en la escala de OMNI-Res) y una sesión de control (SC - reposo por 50 minutos). Antes y después de cada sesión, la PA aórtica fue evaluada por la técnica de tonometría de aplanación. Resultados: Hubo un aumento en la PA aórtica sistólica (P < 0,002) y media (P < 0,001) en las dos sesiones, sin embargo, se observaron aumentos mayores en la SC (P < 0,001). Además, la PA aórtica diastólica sólo aumentó después de la SC (P = 0,004). El efecto hipotensor del ejercicio sobre la PA aórtica sistólica, diastólica y media fue de -12 ± 2, -6 ± 2 y -7 ± 2 mmHg, respectivamente. Conclusión: Una sola sesión de entrenamiento de resistencia promovió efecto hipotensor en la PA aórtica de pacientes con EAP, indicando una reducción aguda del riesgo cardiovascular en esa población. Nivel de Evidencia I; Estudios terapéuticos - Investigación de los resultados del tratamento.

OBJECTIVE: The present study analyzed blood pressure responses after a single session of isometric handgrip exercise performed with different volumes and intensities by patients with hypertension. METHODS: This randomized crossover trial submitted 12 hypertensive patients (58±5 years old) to four isometric handgrip exercise sessions in a random order: 4 x 2 min at 30% of the maximal voluntary contraction (S30%); 4 x 2 min at 50% of the maximal voluntary contraction (S50%2min); 4 x 3 min at 30% of the maximal voluntary contraction (S30%3min); and a control session. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and rate-pressure product were measured pre- and post-exercise (30th min). RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in cardiovascular variables after any session (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Similarly, individual analyses revealed heterogeneity in the responses, including increases in blood pressure observed in some sessions. Patients with reduced blood pressure after an isometric handgrip exercise session exhibited a higher body mass index, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate (p<0.05). They also tended to be younger (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Isometric handgrip exercise performed with different intensities and volumes did not reduce the blood pressure of hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of a single bout of resistance exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation in patients with peripheral artery disease. METHODS: Fifteen patients with peripheral artery disease (age: 58.3±4.0 years) underwent the following sessions in a random order: resistance exercise (three sets of 10 repetitions of the six resistance exercises with a workload of 5-7 in the OMNI-RES scale) and control (similar to the resistance session; however, the resistance exercises were performed with no load). The frequency domain (low frequency, high frequency and sympathovagal balance) and symbolic analysis (0V, 1V and 2V patterns) of heart rate variability were obtained before and until one hour after the interventions. RESULTS: After the resistance exercise and control sessions, similar increases were observed in the consecutive heartbeat intervals (control: 720.8±28.6 vs. 790.9±34.4 ms; resistance exercise: 712.9±30.1 vs. 756.8±37.9 ms; p<0.05) and in the pattern of the symbolic analysis with no variation (0V) (control: 25.1±3.5 vs. 33.4±4.1%; resistance exercise: 26.1±3.2 vs. 29.7±3.5%; p<0.05) until 50 min after both interventions. The pattern of two variations (2V) decreased similarly (control: 11.2±2.1 vs. 8.3±2.1%; resistance exercise: 9.5±1.7 vs. 7.8±1.7%; p<0.05). In contrast, the pattern of one variation (1V), the low and high frequency bands and sympathovagal balance did not change after the interventions (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: A single bout of resistance exercise did not alter cardiac autonomic modulation in patients with peripheral artery disease.